>>56380826now what's the names of luke's stand?
>>56379543i'm always game to answer specific questions if anyone's got any, but as for brush settings i think, generally speaking, people kind of make too big a deal out of them. they're only really relevant if you're trying to mimic the look of certain textures or traditional techniques like water color or pencil sketching. what matters outside of that is merely if the brush feels comfortable to use, for example having a low stabilizer setting to achieve a more natural brush stroke vs a high stabilizer setting to smooth out shaky lines, or minimum density being set low or high to achieve varying vs uniform line widths respectively. for example the only thing i think really matters all that much about the setting in
>>56379439 is that i have the texture set to paper. picrel is the brush with and without that texture. i like the rough pencil-y look, hence why i set it up like that
