>>56107051>>56108509Eh. I like the idea of the first one, but I'm not a fan of the second. I get that it eats everything and therefore its evolution gets fat, but I'm just really not a fan of fat Pokemon. Plus the evo's head is pretty massive, so it looks like one big ball.
>>56107117Not going to comment on all of these, but I really like the Grass starter line and the coyote looking line under it.
In the middle there's two blank spaces, then a Water/Dragon-looking dog-like line to the right, that one looks great as well.
And of course the Dragon Eeveelution looks cool, too.
>>56108025Weird, but not too bad actually.
>>56109406I respect the motif behind the line, but I'm not a fan of their designs. Just not my cup of tea, can't really offer any constructive criticism.
>>56109550I like the design, but looks too weird for a Pokemon game. Love the name though, the book of Genesis is a favorite of mine.
>>56109810The designs themselves are pretty good, but they all look kinda similar to each other. Interested in seeing their evolutions, though.
>>56111306Confusing design. Sableye is the bird, right? The larger pictures on the bottom have a confusing perspective.
>>56111521I cannot tell if the final evolution is morbidly obese or not. Not sure if its melted gold or rolls of fat. Respect your pixel art skills, but I feel it may be sabotaging your artistic vision here.
>>56112532Top and Right-most ones are kinda ugly, but the musical skeleton line on the left is a pretty neat concept. Why in the world pay $60 for it though? Unless your a game dev, just no.
>>56112580Legendaries (I assume) on the top look great. But of the bottom ones, only the right-most one looks good. Rest are pretty ugly and/or uninteresting.
Hit character limit. Nice.
