>>39807547>HE QUADRUPLES DOWN ON ITNo I’m stating a fact. You do understand the concept of burden of proof yes? You are the positive claimant, not me.
>The logic I wanted to get from the question I asked you is not the logic that comes from anything beyond giving yes or no to my question.You seem confused Anon because yes it was. Also YOU ASKED for my reasoning and now you say you never wanted it? The cognitive dissonance going on in your brain must be dizzying
>You implied that you know why this conversation went southThis conversation went south because your salty I answered in more than 1 word and gave my reasoning which you ask for then got salty all over again because I did it with sass because you’re new here. Now you just can’t let it go.
>No. This is literally not an answerYes it is. Read the rest of the post you yourself said you refused to read. An Ad hom is only an Ad hom if you don’t follow it up with the actual point. You’ve been salty all these posts because you refuse to read or don’t want to as you’d have to admit you didn’t get my intentions
>And you are deflecting away from the pointNo actually I was right on point. If you think nobody talks as I did then you haven’t been here very long.
>I want you to fuck off and get bent Then why have you kept this going?
>Then again, I do get off on this, so let's not end it.Then in that case I’m going to end it to spite you, and because I actually have a job so spending the night arousing a seriously salty Anon isn’t work chopping off a finger or crushing a knuckle to to fatigue. Been fun but I’m heading to bed, go on respond if you want by the time I could see it this thread will long be dead.
