>>35683060I'm pretty sure that's fake. It's far too convenient.
>>35683211There were confidential stamps on a previous leak or two, I believe, but they looked different. The confidential stamp could still be legitimate, but there are too many OTHER problems that stick out for it to be real. I mean, it's possible, but unlikely.
>>35683419The problem is that that tweet is in Chinese. The drawing is the only part with Japanese text.
