>>16211118Basically it's because smut doesn't have to be well-written to get you off (which is to say, to fulfill its purpose) nor will it being well-written guarantee it succeeds in that regard. I notice a lot of smut is written in a very "primal" style with relatively simple prose because when you just want to jack off that's all you need and often all for which you have the patience in that situation. If I wanted to read romance novels I'd look for them. Similarly if I wanted to read more of your posts I'd go to /b/.
