>>54102529Now, now. There's no need for that hostility.
I mean, if he somehow, hypothetically speaking of course, purely as a thought experiment, in a mere what-if scenario, loses the mental ability to find humans attractive through some random and bizarre act of fate, how am I at fault if he turns elsewhere for his.... urges?
I mean, I didn't make him attracted to me, and I didn't make him actually.. engage. He chose to do that, and well, is it not my duty as his Pokemon to make sure he feels satiated? My thoughts and feelings about such an event occurring beforehand are irrelevant in that situation.
I mean, there's nothing saying it could just as easily have happened naturally (Not that I'm saying it didn't, or that it happened at all). And it's not like he had any prior romantic commitments, and perhaps he seemed and continues to (hypothetically) seem very pleased with the way things are turning out (Because in this hypothetical thought experiment I am so very, very much better for him than anyone else could ever be)
So, in this purely fictional scenario, how would I be in the wrong? I'm merely a subject of some pre-destined course to which fate has set me, who wants only what's best for their trainer (Even if they don't know that it's what's best for them)
