>>56842957Notice how this anon never actually proved his point, he just wrote a lot and threw in some ad hominems.
Instead he just cobbled together some jargon to make him sound like an intellectual, instead because of lines like this;
>here's how I know what I know: when I read the words the author wrote, I went inside his brain and I saw the choices he made as though they were my ownHe, instead, sounds like a teenager trying to pad out a very poorly written essay or rather, an ape that can't think more than
>ook ook me crush things with rockBasically, if you had evidence or a line you would have posted it by now but it probably hit you as you were crying that you were wrong the entire time and now you're desperately trying to save face.
