>>22594786Dammit, I'm a bit sad to here that Gardevoir is in his new book, as I gave it a miss thinking it was Gardevoir free. Oh well, I guess that's what I get for not properly checking, hopefully I didn't miss too much.
I'll definitely be taking those photos for a few of my friends who want them, no doubt about that, the question is just whether or not I'd post them somewhere publicly. I can't say I'd be too worried about devaluing a book as I don't have plans to sell them and I still own the physical copy, and it'd be hard to call me a collector with this being my first purchase, but it's just that I do remember back when the holy grail books didn't get scanned and I had no clue about how to buy them.
But I don't know, I do know it's a serious thing for others like you who collect and resell them, which is why I'm not sure.
