>>38583552Why do you think the design is sexualized?
If it's because you think it has a defined ass, than look at the refernce art for it. It literally has a a rounded bottom. Only the commissioned art work has the defined cheeks. See pic related for an actual comparison for a pokemon with actual canon butt cheeks compared to the fakemon. I honestly think most of this sexualization you're whinning about is projected by you not necessarily the design itself. Sure it's overtly girly and feminine, but I could see it as male too. (Probably just me) Plus I think it's basis kind of justifies even a slight sexualization of it. If anything all I see is a girly deer/goat/rabbit thing with some plants thrown on. I don't even think it's that good of a design too, it has potential, but you're acting as if it's the greatest sin to ever happen to monster design fucking ever. Trust me, we've all seen a lot worse, even by more "competent" and established artists. I don't even want to see you try and say you haven't because I'm 99.9% sure you have. And this thing certainly doesn't warrant almost an entire thread of discussion dedicated it.
I'm really trying to nip this in bud, before this shit spills all out of control.
But I'm also against bullshit and blantant lies which compells me to respond. If you just don't like its design than so be it, but don't go creating lies about it to justify your disdain, if anything your only making other anons and especially furfags like it because they see it triggers certain people.
