>>37041757unless the topic is smol, then its neither Micro or Macro, but Tiny.
E.g.
In your picture
>>37041684This Sylveon is Tiny, and the viewer is normal height. However, since the topic is not larger than the viewer, its not Macro or Micro, it's Tiny.
Now, if the topic had a Micro Sylveon and a Normal sized Espeon, it would then be considered Micro again because the topic includes a size difference between two entities in the topic.
If the image had a normal sized Sylveon and a very large Espeon, it would be macro because of the size difference between the two entities in the topic.
There are also classification of macro, depending on the size difference. Let's say for instance the Espeon is about 3/4 times bigger/taller than the normal sized Sylveon. This is known as "Amazon/Beefcake" and not really macro. However, If the Espeon is about 8/10 times bigger/taller than the normal sized Sylveon, it then becomes regular Macro. A good rule of thumb, "If it can squash it/eat it whole, it's macro."
Likewise with micro content, A normal sized Espeon and a Sylveon that is 3/4 times smaller isn't micro, it's either Dwarfism, or Parenthood.
If the Sylveon however is 8/10 times smaller than the normal sized Espeon, it's micro content then. Then same rule of thumb applies, "If the tiny can be squashed/eaten whole" then its officially micro.
It's a bit confusing yes, however once you make the distinction, then you know the world of Macro/Micro/Size Difference.
