>>34237424>You're the anti-gen 5 shitposter, no one else makes these shit quality bait threads.Half right. I don't make any of these threads though my crying little friend.
>There's also the fact that you *miraculously* were here to post at the same time.And yet you're here every time to damage control for gen 5 lmao
>Enjoy paid reviews actually affecting the objectivity of your view on these games, but then againI've played through the 7th gen games 4 times nigger, those reviews just reaffirm what I already know, and that is that the games are great.
Meanwhile you're frothing out the mouth because your games bombed in sales, bombed in reviews and are generally disliked by everybody outside of the underage containment board that is /vp/.
>makes this thread expecting to be praised for his shit way to determine if games are good or notReviews and sales are the be all end all way to prove a game is good my asshurt little friend.
It helps weed out retards like yourself who play a shit game that nobody else likes and yet you still try to claim it's great even though it's completely dog shit.
Brainlets, when will they learn?
>>34237456My opinion factually holds more weight because I can back up that the games I'm saying are good because they're generally liked, which is reflected in the reviews and they sell a lot.
You on the other hand expect people to take your opinion seriously when your games bombed in sales and reviews.
>"N-n-n-no! It's just a hidden gem I swear!"Absolutely pathetic lmao
