>>33383196Not quite.
There are various levels of furry, and the one applied here is
"Does it mean to sexually turn on the user?" If so, then yes, it's furry. /vp/ is surprisingly conversative when to this.
The tier is as follows:
1. Not Furry (Pokegirls/Trainers)
2. Slightly Anthro (Gajinkas, cosplay)
3. Anthro (Banned for /vp/ 2)
4. Furry (Regular Pokemon posting, if non sexual then no /vp/ 2, if sexual then /vp/ 2.)
5. Dangerously Cheesy (Bui/Slugfucker tier)
It's pretty much "Soft Kink and fetish is allowed, Hard Fetish is not; what that constitutes is up to your own risk and knowledge by lurking and participating."
>>33383190So if someone posts a picture of Ghost Loli swallowing tiny trainers and showing an internal shot of her stomach digesting them alive; you wouldn't consider deleting that?
