>>56166081First - picrel, second - I could so easily turn this argument into again analogy about drugged/dead that it isn't even funny. And if you aren't going full retard about "static picture == physical aspect", then I can also say that this is a fox's muzzle, with a quite easily readable emotional and semantic message, sent in response to the provocative first post. Are you by chance a social retard, who are incapable of understanding non-verbal or not even explicitly stated messages in face-to-face communication between individuals?