>>28496836>>28497038>they're formsSo what you're saying is
It's just forms that's the split evolution?
Honestly I wouldn't mind it being cosmetic differences but if it is exclusive and also going to be something like "new typing/BST spread" I will not like that.
>>28497143I don't think you understand. If I'm going to get a split evolution that's exclusive to one game, if I trade for it, it wont be the nature I'd want, it'd have none of the egg moves I want, and most importantly it can't be nicknamed by me. The problem is that there's extreme exclusivity with this concept. Legendaries I'm okay with since I don't use them unless stated otherwise (VGC) but I'm not going to buy two games just to get a different final evolution.
