>>56169884why are you defending feature removal so much? you might personally think most of that shit is minor but if you keep letting gamefreak get away with whatever they want then eventually they'll remove more features that you DO care about
>Happened in gen 3, had to buy the GC games for a full dexnope, every mon at the time existed within the game's data and could at least be traded in, unlike in switch games that prevent you from catching certain mons entirely
>Graphics don't make a gamecorrect, but the problem is that SV doesn't any redeeming qualities to make up for bad graphics
>Diamond and Pearl were ugly as sinthey look like typical DS games, SV look like N64 games
>Gen 5 also had awful lag, Sinnoh games had awful slowdownwhere? is any of it even remotely as bad as SV?
>Not a worthwhile criticism, each gen had cheese for battlesnothing from a pre 3DS game is comprable to Dynamax, Tera etc.
>if it isn't vital to the player, who cares?it makes the map more empty, GF could do something cool with them but they choose not to
>Stallfagstall is needed otherwise the game becomes nothing but spamming attack moves and that's boring. battles need more flavor than just attacks and Attack/Special Attack boosting moves
>What the actual fuck does this have to do with the games?they show how poorly made the game is
