>>26641060>doesn't see 2nd stage owl's right thigh is lower than the one on the leftThat was an error on my part. The legs are the same thickness.
>owls are flat creatures that lack depthThe pictures are taken at a slight angle, which can affect how they look. Plus, it looks like it has depth to me. The hood is clearly the back of the head.
>doesn't center with the triangle on its chestI did, though. That's what the curved line is. It's the contour of the body.
>doesn't realize excadrill's head is made of steel unlike popplio 2nd stage's fleshy headFirst of all, I was referring to the mass behind the steel, not the steel itself. Secondly, Popplio2's head is quite obviously supposed to be a jester hat.
>thinks OP doesn't know line of action and missed the point that the legs show a lack of bending jointsThe paw is bending backward, not just curving.
>uses example of fire only seen in one fire type from gen 5And Litten2+3 are only two fire types from gen VII. What's your point? The way Sugimori/Ohmura render fire is not consistent.
>forgets Malamar is able to fly aroundNothing about its design indicates this.
>thinks stilt legs with single toe is suitable for a pokemon of that shapeThick legs with many toes wouldn't work for that design. There are many Pokemon with single toes.
>misses the point that the rotated leg is an awkward generic poseWhat does this mean? It's a leg, how can the pose be generic?
For a supposed artfag you sure seem content to not illustrate ANY of your points. Don't just say "I'm an artfag" without using that in any way, that proves nothing. If you're an artfag that can SO OBVIOUSLY see the flaws with these "leaks", then you should have no problem backing it up and SHOWING US what makes them so fake. Instead, you opt to say shit like "how is this cat's neck so long" "how is this finger wrapping around this sphere i cannot comprehend"
Again, I don't believe any current leaks are real.
