>>21169115Because posting without a tripcode/name is obviously demanding attention.
>>21169241There's nothing saying "please attribute who dumped it", it instead said "one should make it clear that it's not yours if you re-host so that others do not mis-attribute".
There are always people that open the thread, scan briefly and post elsewhere; I'm pretty sure that some anonymous posters would rather not have a third party unknowingly credit somebody else. Simply putting it into a sub-folder saying 'from other anons' would make it obvious to anyone that it's not originally yours.
>>21169236see pic ;)
a/0/2/1 is what you desire.
