>>48734718If I'm not using a gimmick team I use:
>One 90+ speed and 100+ atk mon with high coverage and low bulk>One 90+ speed and 100+ specA mon with high coverage and low bulk>One 70+ speed and 90+ atk mon with two stab and two utility moves with moderate bulk>One 70+ speed and 90+ specA mon with two stab and two utility moves with moderate bulk>One high def and high specD mon with moderate attack and low speed that has one, maybe two stab moves and core utility moves, or else a stall set depending on how glaring my teams weaknesses are>One high def and high specD mon with moderate specA and low speed that has one, maybe two stab moves and core utility moves, or else a stall set depending on how glaring my teams weaknesses areThis seems non-specific but it typically tends to boil my teams down to the same 100-150 mons. Still a lot of variety though. I do tend to enjoy "cool" designs overall, but I also like some "cute" designs as well as a few oddball designs (pic related) too. But designs that seem battle-functional in a battle oriented game I just naturally gravitate too.