>>52627391>none of this disproves anythingIt's not supposed to disprove anything. It's just a compilation of images and sentiments seen in threads like this as a quick primer for imaginefag theory. There's no intention to disprove or disparage any other theory, and it's not meant to present imagination as the only theory. Nothing in the images is definitive proof, just potentially supporting evidence and speculation.
>Khu has already stated that these images are -not accurate to their actual forms-I'm thinking about just adding picrelated to the next version of the image for completeness.
