>>53970258Taken out of context, the full scene makes it less weird. Either way it's a young man spending time with his magical pet and not the inane nonsense you have in mind.
>>53970259It's the bedrock of the series. Part of the charm of Pokémon is their friendliness and familiarity which plays into the concept of a Pokémon in the vain of a house pet. Verily so, it's why Tajiri stressed the connection between real wolrd cats and dogs and Pokémon.
>>53970261If they are conceptualized that way it matters which is why the games and anime have no issue portraying Pokémon that way. Verily indeed the games have Pokémon barking, chewing on grass and shoes, displaying zoomies, being washed by their owners just like real dogs and cats and a myriad of other things because a Pokémon occupies those types of spaces. People here having inane groomer fantasies changes nothing.
>>53970280Femine designs exist plus they never depict those type of things in the same vain they never show ghost type Pokémon killing people.
>>53970557Pointing out how inane these fantasies are by using the series is justified. If you want to have your little fantasies do so at your own leisure but don't make them public and don't drag the series down to your level.
