>>46285334I do, to some degree. I'm not an investorfag but I don't want to overpay for a card that is damaged. The front does look all right but it's got some slight edge damage there and a mark I can't quite discern. Might be fuzz, might be a scuff or a scratch.
Also I posted the wrong card back. This is the correct one.
>>46285364That's what I'm thinking. Just didn't know if it might be considered rude or something.