>>22817460>Pokemon has only had Trainer customization in one game.A gen 6 games that ran on the same engine. Customisation was a good feature, and they could have improved upon it. They could have even factored trainer customisation into contests somehow, like how people dress up all fancy and themed for contests in the anime. But no, they just remove the feature completely. Great.
>>22817462>And...?it's copypasted content from a pervious game that we already experienced and paid for. This is supposed to be a new game. Give us something new. This is just lazy.
>see aboveSee above
>these are R/S remakes, not Emerald remakesSo what? Why does the game have physical special split if it's an R/S remake? According to you they have to be 1:1 with R/S besides graphics. This is retarded.
>Exp. Share is optional...Children are the core audienceFirstly, the developers themselves admitted that they casualised the game, so don't try to convince me it's just as difficult as previous games when the developers themselves have told us directly that it has been casualised. I have played the game myself, and restricted myself to make the game more difficult and it is still piss-easy.
Also, pokemon has a huge non-child audience
http://www.siliconera.com/2014/12/01/pokemons-audience-growing-older/>It's literally the same as the originals.Exactly, the originals had horrible distribution, and this should have been fixed in ORAS.
>This is not true.Yes it is.
>This is a hardware limitation.This is Gamefreak being incompetent
>Name one Pokemon game where the AI was actually smart.Pointing out flaws in previous pokemon games does not absolve ORAS from having shitty AI. ORAS is a NEW game and should have been improved upon.
>They look fine to me.They look horrible.
>This is a problem with GF and the players, not the actual game.It's GF's game, they profit when you buy their games, meaning you enable this behaviour.
