>>39805576>it was because the question you were asking was pretentious, loaded, and dumb.You mean you made an assumption on the nature of the question. I asked you if you considered dogs to be wolves due to them being a subspecies. Obviously, even if they know that domestic dogs arose from wolves most people don't even know that dogs are considered an official subspecies of the grey wolf and don't consider them to be wolves themselves. I did, was curious if you did as well, and even went as far as to inquiry on if you held the same view on bird-dinosaur relations since it is a very similar point of view.
>but it was to complex for you grasp>>39805350>Anon I’m not being a smartass>because hes misconstrued my posts and can’t answers greater than one word.All I need is one word to get what I wanted based on what I asked you. I didn't care for much more, so most of what you posted was useless to me, especially when I've already studied the subject myself. If you say yes, I can take that you acknowledging all dogs as wolves. If you say no, that means you don't. I didn't want anything more than that.
