>>57171625You haven't proven your premise that human society wouldn't develop if Pokémon were around. You have demonstrated a very poor understanding of anthropology, based on ridiculous claims like
>>57171537 "fashion wouldn't exist if there were Pokémon."
Your premise that a rational explanation must exist to explain the differences between real life and a made-up fantasy world is absurd. You have failed to propose a rational explanation anyway, since your hypothesis that everyone in the world has fallen under a mass psychic delusion is a totally unfalsifiable claim based on absolutely nothing.
When I pointed this out to your earlier, you dismissed it as an "appeal to the writers," which I did not make or mention. That said, your assertion
>>57171526 that you somehow have a better understanding of the creative intent of the constructed fictional world of Pokémon than the people who actually created it demonstrates that you are delusional and having any kind of rational argument with you is completely pointless.
