>>36203646>Only applies for Gen6+ so no>that only applies right now so it doesn'tAre YOU retarded?
>Yes, but only few.And subsequent generations only introduce a few humanoid Pokemon at a time. I don't think any gen has introduced more humanoid Pokemon than gen 1, even.
>are you retarded?You know damn well what "furbait" means, and fur or not Mewtwo still attracted the lustful gaze of furfags for years.
>No, but certainly Pokemon gets so many ideas from Digimon (pic related) and other series like Dragon Ball, Naruto, Jo Jo Adventures, Yo-Kai Watch, etc.. and only butthurt fanboys keep denying that.There's nothing wrong with taking inspiration from something, though I still argue Trevenant is hardly anything like Cherrymon aside from the whole "living tree" thing. Not even the first vidya to do it, one of the Final Fantasies in the SNES era had a living tree for its antagonist. Hell, Trevenant more reminds me of the forest scene from the old Disney Snow White film.
Why don't you get the stick out of your ass?
>Yes it does, in forms of plushies and other merchs.Which are not "needs" in any respect and thus don't have as wide a market as smartphones. Think of it this way, smartphones have a market of over 100 million people, conservatively speaking, if we're just talking adults in the US alone. Damn near everyone in a developed country is going to own at least one phone in their lifetime. You can't say the same for Pokemon. That's what I mean by "ubiquity".
>it became a sanctuary for furries, that's why.Remember the majority of the player base is adults more than children.
Believe it or not, anon, I'm an adult and not a furry. I've known lots of adult Pokemon fans who weren't furries. They're a niche.
>I love Pokemon too, but it's still a trash series.No you don't, you call the games shit and everything after gen 1 shit. You don't love Pokemon, you love your childhood memories of Pokemon.
