>>39103362>Hitodama *is* a Will-O-Wisp.Wrong.
>Aoandon is represented as a woman. So what you have is a Will-O--Wisp in its stead, and it is not drawn to lamps but is itself a lamp.If Squirtle can be based on minogame because its tail is slightly curvy then Lampent can be based on a yokai literally named "blue lantern". And Squirtle was not only designed without a shiny in mind but Gen I shinies were decided by an algorithm. You're very stupid. It's obvious.
>There's almost nothing in their lore which points to Aoandon besides the embodiment of lamps.If Goldeen having a horn means it could be based off of Vishnu then Lampent being a blue lantern means it could be based off of blue lantern. On top of a hitodama, which isn't a will-o-wisp.
>adhere to it. Naturally, there will be outliers. Psyduck is an outlier of Kanto's trend toward detail.Thanks for taking my advice. See? You didn't have to jerk off to eggs after all.
>Doesn't make it exceptional as a design, however.I could go into why I like Litwick's design but it's way too fucking late. This is my last post. Don't call me out on not having enough time for your bullshit when you used the same excuse (and you're still here, busy shitposting).
>they remain recognizableThis is not a bad thing.
>can't defend drifloonAwesome.
>frillish is goodDo one last thing for me - type a poetic goddamned essay about how great Frillish is. Wikimedia links and all. Frankly, I'm not a huge fan of Frillish. Jellicent is fine. Yeah I know, Frillish has the crowns and the jester look. Masks, too. I've read Bulbapedia. Please tell me something I don't know. Reach for the stars.
