>>29613028>People are always going to dislike things [...]I'll give you this one. Communicating one's idea and appealing to the masses tend to not go hand-in-hand.
I'm not saying that the designs should be changed in any way, just that the opinions of those who viewed it - even the negative ones - is valid.
To say that one's opinion on a subject matter is not important - or so I believe that is what you are implying; apologies if it's not - seems odd, since you are making something for everyone.
>Criticising it based on an associated had by the viewer is unfair [...]You're right in that judging something based solely on one's feeling is unfair, but in the end, that is what most people will do; judging by what they feel best.
Only a handful of people would ever judge something based on how the subject matter actually is.
Although I just realized that your definition of "valid complaint" is different than mine, which I guess is what makes this whole thing confusing for me.
Now that I think about it, maybe I'm just projecting what was once my problem onto this.
I really should stop being too bitter about this.
Also, I noticed most of my arguments are just mentioning the same stuff but worded differently, which is not in a good sign. Like, at all.
I concede here; don't think my
sleep-deprived brain could afford anymore thinking.
Even if it can, you clearly are more well-versed in this than I am, so arguing against you was an absurd notion in the first place.
I had fun though, danke. 