>>20934743>>20934540>>20934474I never understood why people though trashing on the "inanimate objects" were valid excuses to dismiss the newer gens.
I think they're fun and creative. I'd rather people talk down the designs/execution of the concept than the actual concept themselves.
Pokemon don't have to always be based off an animal, real(fish, cats) or mythical(bakeneko, dragons). That'd get kind of boring, actually.
