>>50198057>Wailmer is 2 meter tall which is higher than an average Japanese and Taichi is just 10 year old and Zenomaru being slightly taller than 10 year old actually makes him smaller.Zeromaru is a literal midget compared to triceramon, He's an entire head above taichi. He should be in the ball park of 5'10-6ft and he's Literally not even as big as triceramon's leg. The rock formation triceramon destroyed was with use of sheer physical force from his head. Not to mention it's still bigger than triceramon even after his attack destroyed it. That's not even including the length. The cliff is smaller and that's a fact.
>Furthermore, don't forget that Lycanroc is small 2'07'' feet tall dog therefore it will take much force for it destroy a cliff than something as big Tracermon. Except for the fact that triceramon PULVERISED THE ROCK he destroyed. It takes much more energy to pulverise something than to simply fragment it like lycanroc did. Oh and remember that plus it's the weight that matters.
>Why would I download that I probably post once.So you can actually give a reasonable counter argument and improve your argument by providing evidence.
>In other world it was just possibly a big boldeSmall planetoid is basically a big boulder so yes you're right.
>Not as much as Pokemon take to destroy them. Actually if we go with your logic in that digimon have no weight to them, Then it'd actually take more effort for a digimon to destroy something than a pokemon takes to destroy something. Because it's dependant on the creatures mass.
>Triceramon didn't destroyed the rock completely ether and large part of that still remain. If anything Pikachu completely obliterate top half the rock unlike Tracermon.Pikachu fragmented it, Triceramon pulverized it. The rock triceramon destroyed was certainly longer than the rock pikachu destroyed but it could be the rock pikachu destroyed was taller. It's hard too compare the two honestly.
