>>45273160>True, but I just jumped into this chain so I wasn't really talking about intent, myself.We're not even arguing the same thing, so I have no reason to further engage in this conversation, but
>at least putting all the Pokemon in the data showed the intent to give everyone back their bros eventually. Even if the method was ludicrously dumb.They have expressed explicit want to do just that. The dex will be rotating, a mon gone now probably won't be gone by next game, and vice versa. THAT is a ludicrously dumb method of doing it, but they've shown intent.
>I am. I'm arguing quality.Cool. Now give me the reason why GF split the dex behind 6 games and then we can continue. Gen 3 was my first gen, and second favorite overall. In contrast, Gen 6 is my least favorite, with Gen 8 right behind it. This has absolutely no bearing on what I've argued, and I won't let personal tastes cloud the entire reason I responded to that jackass in the first place. I agree with nearly everything you said, but I'm not interested in discussing it. Not here, not now at least.
>>45273175>never defend Gen 8, outright say it handled the dex poorly multiple times. SImply say that that doesn't excuse the utter kikery from Gens 1 all the way to 7 over 25 years of bad business practices.>DUUUUUURR YOU'RE JUST (boogieman) GO GET A LIFEthe mind of the average /vp/er is truly an enigma.
