>>44687771>>no matter how well swooshie sold, it doesn't change the fact that it's the worst pokemon game to date,That would be objectively gen 1
>suffering from the most content cutsBecause it has the most amount of content/expectations to cut.
>poor graphics and animationsIt has better graphics and animations than every mainline game
>linearityThe story is but it was designed where to can just hang out in the wild area and the IoA DLC can be done before, during or after the main story making it non-linear
>no postgameNot true.
>gimped dex and movesBut it still has more mons and moves thsn 70% of the games
>and not to mention that gamefreak blatantly lied about it.Their only lie was about reused models, but that doesn't even matter if you knew how transferring models from a 3ds to switch works
>>customers refusing to buy an inferior product until a company produces a superior product is common practice. No one "refused" to buy anything accept a loud minority that got brainwashed on the internet
>given how horrible pokemon has become recently, you really ought to not condone gamefreak with your money.This is arguing using the conclusion.
>>"i enjoyed it" isn't an argument. monkeys enjoy throwing their feces and pedophiles enjoy raping defenseless little kids. you can EASILY enjoy something that's bad.But who are you to tell them that it's bad if they like it? Are you and this minority of dexcommunists the gods of objective quality or something?
>sales and your enjoyment are all subjective measures of the product and are thus invalid for judgmentNo but they are fair indicators to point out. Meanwhile, you still have yet to explain how SS can be called objectively bad
