>>37778149The thing is that brazilian monkeys have absolutely no meat. To put it simple, natives figured out that is more useful to eat frogs than monkeys. Even if it's full of cartilage, the work of getting rid out the leather, and it's fur, is not worth it. Without mentioning the risks of disease, one of the highest for humans.
Completely different from erating foxes. Anyway
>>37776592This guy might be right. Angolan monkeys are bigger and more common. But I still thinking the photo looks fake as fuck. The whole setup reminds of the "CHINESE PEOPLE EATING FETUS" photos.
Pic related, a brazilian monkey