>>23087357Ah, you're right, that completely went over my head. It's just that it's become a pretty popular picture.
I do agree it's a good image thoughAs for the rule though, anthro and furry does seem to be a pretty grey area, with no one definition most people can agree on. Some say it applies to things that have fur and/or are based on real animals like a dog, and others say it's anything that isn't human, and with how human-like Gardevoir is, it's smack bang in the middle of the grey area of the term. There's a bit of a difference between just putting on a chest, and completely changing the build of Gardevoir to match a human build.
I'm not exactly complaining about it getting removed as I'm not posting it, but it would be nice if we were allowed to post the nicer and less sexualised pictures like
>>23080808 >>23082526 >>23084458I have nothing against something like
>>23084071 being removed though.
