>>29414640>>29414665>>29414685>>29414708>>29414764>>29414812>>29414885>>29414927>>29414989>>29415025>>29415112>>29415127>>29415233>>29415289>>29415326Oh wow, not this again. We have no evidence that Scizor is a top deck. However, one tournament does not necessarily mean it's bad.
Wait for more tournaments before making a decision on what will be good and what won't.
>The point is that extrapolating based on one point holds infinitely more weight than extrapolating on no pointsm8, no. If that one point is an outlier, you just made a massive mistake. Giving too much weight to one point of data is a great way to jump to incorrect conclusions.
Trying to claim Scizor is objectively good despite 0/32 is really dumb as well though.
