>>26644751first off, i'm not backpedaling. I never agreed to anything you said thus far.
by deviantart-tier I mean it's your run-of-the-mill art style with its usual flaws. Those artists are still clearly in the process of improving or experimenting.
>trying this hard to defend something that anon stated they don't even believe>OP is a faggot. I'm-clearly-right-mentality>OP insinuates there is always room for growth>anon is so dense to limit generic art as perfection>implying all fakemon artists have mastered the arts>implying all fakemon artists are equally fit for a job at GFThere are great Pokemon artists out there. But when you try to copy a specific art style that you did not make on your own, you're rarely going to get it spot on. Coloring in the Sugi and Ohmura style is one thing, but there's other factors like lineart, design, etc.
Here, since it seems to please you so much, I made a quick edit trying to keep it as original as possible
>inb4 artfag using ms paint>inb4 generic reply from anon that never agrees to changes madeand yes, the fakes are fucking obvious you dense nut. There's a reason why people immediately turned to the newer leaks. Side by side comparison shows one artist is more skillful than the other. It still counts as criticism because I'm pointing out some errors in the artist's work. Other people have done the same
learn to stop putting words in other people's mouths and suckin your own dick anon.
