>>31586992Its bizarre how it always turns out the same with Sound type threads. You get a few people who try to see how much stuff they can come up for to make Sound a full type, you know, for fun, and then you get others who adamantly attempt to stop all talk about it every time.
Like, every Sound thread.
It also doesn't help that anti-Sound anons always have the weakest arguments, and whenever other types and their looseness or contradictions are brought up, you get constant "no u"s.
I don't get it, whats the harm in conceptualising a new type?
