>>29601278Not him, but:
> requires that you hold your hand a certain way for extensive periods of time, which can be uncomfortable> uses up a button that could be used for something more valuable, like a shortcut to your item pocket or something> fundamentally bad design - requires that the player hold a button more often than they release it - that makes GF look kinda stupid or too attached to its sacred 20th-century cows> could potentially damage the button faster, maybe, I don't actually know shit about hardware>>29601375It's not our tastes that have changed - it's pokémon itself that's changed.
>>29601396If you were my loyal husband (just roll with it) of 10 years, and I said "I'm divorcing you and marrying a guy with more money," you'd be pissed, right? You'd feel betrayed, because you thought your loyalty deserved to be rewarded, because that's how our culture works, right?
Well, maybe, the Japanese don't care about the concept of a "fanbase." Or maybe nobody there over 18 plays pokémon. But it's not what we expect here in the west. And that makes us angry.
