>>41679905you’re right on all account that a children’s game such as Pokemon would be designed with specifically entertaining children in mind, but I gotta correct you on the sexual pandering as it’s usually done with *little* girls, in favor of the pedos that still buy the games if it has “cute girls” and all.
I mean really, the over two-decade-long jerkfest over Misty was already bad enough since she’s 11 or 12, but now they’re sexualizing the kid in the Eevee costume who’s half her age. Absolutely disgusting behavior.
