>>44323537 >>44323473Who are we to say that leading a revolution and enslaving humanity is a choice for 5000 IQ and not 50 IQ? Perhaps he is smart enough to think that if he disrupts the status quo too much, it will reflect on the legendary players of the highest level themselves, and no matter how smart you are, if Arceus calls you out of existence, you will be finished. He may be playing 4D chess by promoting the right trainers to tactical locations and subtly implementing the butterfly effect to optimally change the future. The smartest strategy is not to be a revolutionary because even a revolutionary with the most brilliant revolutionary can end up in the same fate as a normal person. In the end, even a genius is just an ordinary person. He knows that the tragedy of a brilliant mastermind with 5000 IQ is a doomed judgment and if he becomes a good revolutionary then he will be different. Therefore, he knows he will never go there. This is the same for us if we know that we are doing everything right, we will not be lucky and if a miracle happens it will not happen because of us. We don't have to be the ones who can change the world, but we can try to make a small contribution. Maybe he has no choice but to try. If all the smartest people in the world could come to a consensus that we should not overestimate the power and influence that we can have, this will not change the world. What we can influence and change is very limited and we can influence things like who will do the work and how it will be done.