Quoted By:
>literally a (object)
>literally a (animal)
>literally a (person)
>literally a generic (____-type)
>literally doesn't even look like a (____-type) wtf
>literally (animal) + (animal) + (object)
>literally rip-off (gen 1-3 pokemon)
>too goofy
>over designed
>under designed
After seeing so many of these popular complaints, I'm curious as to what you look for in a pokemon. What is your idea of a perfect pokemon design? I get /vp/ isn't one person, I just rarely see good-design Circle-Jerks
