>>12317825You fared better than the OP, if this will cheer you up.
>>12317866Care to explain what are you rating, lad?
>on topic: Gallade. Though it will be hard to elaborate on 'why?', because it is a classic case of a character that you know you are going to like upon the first encounter.
With the franchise claimed from the bottom to the top by epic and intimidating beasts AND cutesy huggable blobs, those few that have the capacity for sympathetic - yet non-baby-helpless- appearance really stand out by the mile.
-A fine design and interesting overall concept are the bonuses that came a long way towards actually pushing this one right to the top in my book.
A bit of shame that he is sooo hit or miss among the general poke fandom in virtually every aspect of his placement, design and 'viability'- even the most basic middle ground would have helped.
