Back for about an hour or so to do some requests (I'll start with the ones on the anchor), but before that I feel the need to address some things.
>>51838482>>51838636Yes, Ai 'art' is not for everyone. It is not perfect and it has it flaws. I'm not claiming it's better than what real artists create, because it's definitely not. The reason why many (of my images at least) look samey is because of certain 'quality' tags I use. They give me an anime artstyle I, and apparently a few other anons here, like. Is it perfect? no, it's made by a freakin' ai, of course it's not, but it does something create pretty nice images from time to time. I'm just a guy that wants to play around with an ai and hopes to make some people happy by doing some requests for them while I'm at it.
>>51839538Changing artstyles is not as simple as changing a tag. The people who have used the ai know this. As I said, I like this 'artstyle', so I make my pics mostly like this, but I'm still learning and experimenting, and it's already miles better than what it was weeks ago. It is a machine that learned to draw from only a bunch of different artists, so yes, everything it does is by definition less creative than what they do. You are right to say that the ai is very limited right now, it is. It can't do intricate scenes or characters. It's limited by its training data, and its too few. I'm just having fun, spending some time taking challenges and seeing if I can push the ai to its limits. If you don't like it, that's fine, because apparently there's some people here that do. I'm not charging anything, and I even have to pay for all images I generate, but I don't mind, since I'm just having some fun, playing around with some new ai on the internet, hoping to generate some things people like.
Okay, sorry for the 'rant', I felt the need to say something since some of it was clearly directed at me. Anyway, hope that the people who don't like these threads can understand. Have a nice day anons.
