>>38800987See, now you’re arguing on an objective basis while using ad hominems.
You haven’t given any examples or explained your reasoning as to why this dog simply must be sucking a dick beyond your whole “Swords are a euphemism for dick” thing, which still doesn’t hold water, because it still doesn’t explain how this applies to this instance.
Again, this is why you’re being called gay. You see sword, think “dick”, look at a dog holding a sword, and think, “furry felatio porn”. The line of logic that connects it all is shaky at best.
