>>53020459i did not. i'm saying you have a very cartoonish and factually incorrect account of very recent history. but it's to be expected since leftist mongrels like you have the iq of a rock and the memory of a goldfish. idk how many times ive had to repeat arguments i've been having for 20+ years just for a new crop of lefties to pop up completely ignorant that their side has already lost the debate 100000000 times. totally smug and confident in their false narratives, strawmen, cherry picked information, and complete ignorance of massive datasets that existed for decades, completely hanging on the few "facts" they gleaned from revised history and made up words/revised definitions.
i have never once seen a progressive be right on anything, which is absolutely impressive in the worst way because even a retard can accidentally say something poignant every now and then.
that said, i just wanted to know if the game was shit and if this is what the thread has devolved too then my suspicions were correct.
