>>57554284>>57554830Yeah this is my thoughts on this too. It is all fictional and isn't set in stone or anything. Even then, slapping the age onto the character is usually done so to pander to the audience like that person said. Besides, I find myself more attracted to the older characters (even when I was a kid), like Lorelei, Sabrina, Karen, Professor Ivy, etc. If tomorrow the Pokemon company said 'umm actually Lorelei is canonically 16 years old' then: 1) I wouldn't believe them because she looks in her late 20s, and 2) I don't care either way because she's still a fictional character.
