>>18438840Oh, I believe that's not THAT cutter bunny, but rather a prevolution to it. So
>>18437501 would evolve into
>>18438840.
>>18438148I tried drawing it, how's this? An idle arm would look kind of awkward against all that fluff, so I imagine it retracts its arms into its coat-fluff when not using them for anything.
...Only now noticed the arms might've been supposed to be on the front rather than the sides, whoops.