>>29680625>You said "aesthetic" is not a wordNo I did not and as someone who practices art-making as a career I know a thing or two about the language revolving around it.
>You said shonen is one genre for boysNo, I explained that it is born from things made for boys and became a genre.
>Shojo is for girls retard. Macross is for otaku and welcome to the NHK is actuall seinen, none of which are covered by young boys.Shin Chan is your only possible example and is not a genre on its own. Provide the asked example.
My explanation makes sense, I suppose you need to have a functioning mind to understand it though.
NHK was serialised in Shounen Ace, as well. So you just beat your own argument again.
>So it;s a demographicIgnorantly restating things without an explanation isn't an argument.
>And yet the examples you provided for other genres aimed at boys are manga not aimed at boysHow are you this dumb? Macross, Tetsujin, Code Geass and Gundam are all targeted at young boys, none of them are shounen.
>To prove this wrong, you should provide tropes common to all of its manga, but you already said they dont all have the same tropes, therefore making shonen not a genreAlready did that.
>Anon, proving me right doens't count as beating me. Kinda the opposite how is it possible to be this deluded?You made a statement and were proven wrong. You have offered no counter arguments of any kind and have instead shat yourself in circles while being meticulously picked apart by actual arguments based in fact.