>>39587466That's a very good point. Still, the ability to to transform would be very fun, because you could assume a fake identity and do things, or meet people and Pokemon, you wouldn't otherwise.
>>39587496I agree with this, all signs seem to point to immortality, but it makes me wonder: are the first and eighth movie Mew the same creature? They seem to follow very different life roles and have slightly different personalities and origins, so it wouldn't make sense for them to be the same one. If you've seen the prologue for the Japanese release of the first film, you may remember the ancient society in Guyana that worshiped Mew and commemorated it in their art. Does Mew remember those people? Does it miss them? I always envision Mew as a kind and merciful Pokemon, along the lines of the version of the movie we got in the English release of Mewtwo Strikes Back where Mew doesn't want to fight, and it recognizes that Mewtwo is its equal and not inferior because of its circumstances. This perspective makes sense, because a creature that has lived for eons of history should be able to tell that hatred has never led to successful outcomes. But other than that, the rest of the media we've seen of Mew paints it as a little too childish and out of touch to have as much empathy as it appears, as
>>39587541 discussed. Is Mew truly good? Or does it have flaws like the rest of us? Do different Mew have different philosophies?
