>>39990227>Yes I was. It's relative to that postwar ideal of masculinity that people are "directionless betas."No you weren't, you were trying to trivialize everyone's image of masculinity by insulting them while desperately trying to veil it as a discussion of the subjective interpretation of masculinity.
>No, it's this ideal of masculinity that, I think, informs the cuck/tranny obsession. I don't think, say, a 4channer's ideal of masculinity is some 18th century French fop or something.There's no obsession, it's you projecting that everyone sees trannies when they disagree with them, which is what you're doing but with betas unironically. If you were on 4chan long enough you'd know people use buzzwords to insult each other for laughs since forever.
>My point is that it's no coincidence that insults like "cuck" and "tranny" developed on a forum for a bunch of directionless betas. These sorts of pathetic feminized boogeymen have appeal here precisely because all the men here are pathetic and feminized, and they need some vessel to load their anxieties into.They've been insults since forever and have only been popularized on 4chan after previous insults became mainstream. It has nothing to do with your view of insecure masculinity and everything to do with your inability to read posts on an anonymous forum correctly, probably due to the fact that you're not experienced enough to see things as the way they are. No one here is even remotely close to your idea of feminized, it's just you seeing things through your narrow point of view. Just stop posting, you keep changing the goalpost because you can't accept defeat. I'm not even going to bother to reply because I know you'll insist I'm wrong and anyone disagreeing is some internal feminized reaction to the matriarchy rising or something else mentally ill. You see what you want to see.
