>>53429653>Just because they can be tamed doesn't mean they're all likeCyclizars in canon have been partnered with humans since before Pokeballs were a thing, as a species they basically bent the knee to humans long before most other Pokemon, like dogs or something. The game says they've been ridden by humans "since ancient times", you can't 'hurrdurr not ALL of them are like that' out of this one because every single source for the game says Cyclizars are docile to human beings.
>Cyclizar isn't a pokemon that runs away from you Cyclizar ingame are literally just running in any direction, if they "attack" you it's because you're in their way.
>Use the game as a reference and learn to inferWow, and the game says Cyclizar are docile!
>The page about it doesn't exist to us for you to say that Pokedex describes its feats. It has no reason to 'split the earth' or 'scorch the land' if it's not aggressive like the other Pokemon Heath describes.
>Either way it doesn't change the fact that "paradise" was their goalThen their paradise was flawed from the beginning and could never happen. They wanted the Paradox mons as they were depicted in the book, but never considered the dangers that came with them. That's the professor's own fault and is what costs them everything.
>why you brought up youtubers and random comments, I'll never know Because you were so insistent that no one believes in imagination and that it only exists on /vp/. Not sure why you're walking back on this suddenly, see
>>53429235>> If anything it shows how few people actually believe in the theory because there's >>>only one person >Which is fairly small Didn't you say in an earlier thread that Pokemon lore is an inherently niche topic to justify why there weren't many votes for time travel? Which is it?
>and judging by the fact that you had to dig through through the video to find itThat's the best part, I didn't, a friend linked the video to me.
>phones don't exist.I'm not a phoneposter.